requestId:684d9120113793.72406939.
“Integrated Standard Structure of the Integration of Confucianism, the Integration of Cadi Judicial and the Comprehensiveness of the Law” was directed by
Author: Li Qintong (Authorized by Deputy Hunan University of Law Baosheng Sweetheart Network”)
Source: Author Author Authorized by Confucian Network
[Author’s Guide] Reading: “Integrated Standard Structure of the Integration of Confucianism of Law, the Integration of Cadi Judicial and the Integration of Gift Law”, Li Qintong, published “Social Society” 2021, No. 2, Pages 167-191.
The modern Chinese judgment is whether it is a judgment in accordance with the law or a judgment in principle, and whether it can be related to the Cardi Judicial period, which is related to the basic understanding of China’s traditional judicial review form. In this regard, domestic and foreign legal history and legal theory scholars have conducted counter-reviews and corrections. These discussions deepened their understanding of this topic at the different levels and achieved considerable rich and in-depth research results, but have not yet reached a common understanding on this issue. The reason why the academic community is difficult to reach a common understanding is that the perspectives of different scholars are different. For example, the characteristics of traditional judicial trials in China are different from those in the civil and criminal cases, and there are differences in the differences between the local and central levels, not to mention that the literature data relied on by multiple scholars is incomplete. However, the question concepts of these differences are essentially similar, and the discussions about whether the legal source in traditional Chinese judicial review is one yuan or multiple, and how state-owned legal system has the power to judicial personnel of all levels. The article “Integrated Standardization of the Integration of the Confucianization of Law, the Integration of Cadi Judicial and the Confucianism of the Law and the Law of the Law and the Law of the Law and the Law of the Law and the Law of the Law and the Law of the Law and the Law” (hereinafter referred to as “this article”) discusses the situation of the Confucianization of Law and the law and the law and the law and the law and the law and the law and the law and the law and the law and law to judge the form of judicial judgment under the concept of Confucianism of Law and law and law.influence. Although the fate of Confucianism has been questioned in recent years, after the mid-term of Western Han Dynasty, the content and energy of traditional laws have gradually undergone in-depth changes. The Confucianization of the law as Teacher Qu Tongzu said was to integrate Confucianism, especially the tribute, into the national legal system represented by “law”, and to realize the historical process of the content of the law and the transformation of energy. Compared with the Qin and Tang dynasties, the two have shown certain inheritance in their content, but the weight of legal interests protected by laws and the principles of applicable laws have changed, and the energy of laws is extremely large. The law makes Confucianism quite accurate for the nascent integration of this phenomenon. The interpretation of the Confucianism-turned-destiny is not limited to this, it also means that the traditional Chinese legal concept recognizes the existence of a legitimate authority independent of imperial power. This may be regarded as a decree for the separation of Taoism and politics in the history of traditional political thinking. This makes the Fa天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国天国� In legislation, national order law is not a separate law; in judicial practice, national order law is not regarded as a separate basis for judicial review.
The theoretical thinking in this article is to try to explain the multi-law source structure in the traditional Chinese legal concept from the perspective of criminal law. This article believes that the Taiwan Protective Network has matured with the gradual maturity of the concept of sin. The crime has become the basis of evaluation behavior, and the intermediary performance has been developed between the outsider and the punishment. If an act is punishable, it will be evaluated as a crime, and then it will be punished as a statutory consequence. This form of judicial review can be simplified as “act → crime → punishment”. Among them, crime is the focus of criminal legislation. What behaviors will be evaluated as crime and the lightness of the 平台官网 VIP will have a continuational impact on the entire form of judicial judgment. Since the law has become Confucian, Confucianism has become the focus of evaluating crimes. The so-called Confucianism means that Confucianism replaces Legalism as a legal process to determine which one is a crime. The process of undertaking is not thorough, and there is a phenomenon of convergence of Confucianism and Law, but the evaluation criteria for crimes have gradually changed from the law to Confucianism. However, because Confucianism and Law Confucianism makes the concept recognize the many sources of law, and the state system href=”http://twlovestory.org/”>Inclusive of the Internet Motorcycle Coupon There is still a standard for evaluating which one is a sin. This article selects “Greeting” as its representative. This means that, on the one hand, the content and energy of the gift are gradually diverted into the national drafting law, becoming a basis for judging which one is a crime and a serious crime; On the one hand, the foundation of valuation crime has the independence of the state-made law, and tribute and law are both established in the concept of statutory. At the same time, under the Confucian legal concept, punishment is not an independent countermeasure to sin, but the consequences of the statutory after being evaluated for sin also appear in a diverse form. For example, Confucianism will use education as a countermeasure to sin. “Action → Crime → Crime” will turn into “action For →Crime/Gift→Prime/Education”, the little girl raised her head and realized when she saw the cat. She put down her phone and pointed to the table, which is what this article calls the “integrated standard structure of the integration of gifts”. This is also the coordinate system used in this article to assess the traditional judicial review form of China.
This embedded standard structure is used to recognize the concept of traditional laws. The source of law is the basis, and it is believed that it will produce multiple evaluation foundations for a unified behavior, and the consequences of the law will be correspondingly diverse. Therefore, in judicial practice, “action → crime/gift → punishment/education” will lead to four secondary structures, namely “action → crime → punishment” “action → gift → punishment” “action → crime → education” “action → ceremony → education” “action → gift → education” . Among them, Female College Students’ Care Club “Behavior → Crime → Crime” is a classic Legalist verdict thinking. However, after the law was transformed into Confucianism, the energy of sin in this level structure was gradually penetrated by Confucianism. This form of judgment can also support the Confucian legal concept. Of course, in comparison, the latter three secondary structures can more clearly represent the Confucian multi-legal concept. This article uses the “Du Yong Man Abuse Case” published in Zhangjiashanshan’s “Shunting Book” and the “Salvation of Sheepskin Selling Women” published in “Wei Books” and the “Salvation of Sheepskin Selling Women” published in “Wei Books” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records of the Criminal Records” published in “The Books of the Criminal Records of the Criminal Records of the People, the previous case was judged in accordance with the Legal form of “behavior → crime → punishment”, while the latter case was judged in accordance with the representative Confucian form of “behavior → gift → punishment ” and &#
發佈留言