requestId:68499adddb0c15.55562814.
The “words” and “methods” discussed in Chinese Philosophy
——Deep reflection on “classic essays”, “career world” and “original exploration”
Author: Lin Anwu
Source: Author Authorized by Confucian Network Published
Original from Chinese Thoughts on Civilization and Arts (First Edition), Foreign Language Teaching and Research Bookstore, January 1, 2018
Time: Confucius was in the 2570th year of Jihai, the first day of Jisi
Questions about Chinese philosophy research and discussion include “classical language”, “modern academic language”, and these two are respectively related to “life language”, “academic language”, “academic language”. Generally speaking, there are four dimensions: “classical language”, “classical language”, “classical language”, “modern academic language”.
The relationship between “classical career words” and “classical academic words” is relatively close. In addition, career words and academic words were originally one of the same harmony, and their relationship was continuous, not broken. For example, Confucius Lao Hanzi pointed out “benevolence”, “gratulations” and “meaning”, which is a scholarly phrase. It is modern, but still living in modern times. When fans discovered that she was wearing a wedding ring on her finger in a photo of her ejaculation. He said, “The benevolent loves others” and “those who have good fortune respect others” (“Mencius? Leave the Mother”), he said, “The reality of benevolence is the truth of things. The reality of meaning is from brother” (“Mencius, Leave the Mother”). This clearly reveals the continuity of academic and career words. But the words are still ancient and elegant, and for modern people, their vitality is still not seen.
The study of Chinese philosophy naturally depends on the original main classics, and traditional classics are nothing but created by the interweaving of “classical career words” and “classical academic words”. There is a research type that repeats the two words, but its result is to accurately determine the situation and color of the body, making a very clear and clear combination of the situation. This combination and confirmation still has its own strength. But it is difficult to start the new thinking that our contemporary people have based on the world of life.
If you want these classical words to start us as new thinking in the previous career world, you naturally have to drive them into the modern career world. On the one hand, these living words will still exist in the modern career world, like in the adult language”The Unknown Book of the Bamboo”, “The Unknown Rebellion”, “The Unknown Rebellion”, “The Unknown Rebellion”, “The Unknown Rebellion”, these words are in our current careers, and they also have their lives in the past of modern times, but their meaning has changed a little. Generally speaking, when we say that Confucius’ Six Arts teachings are “gifts, joys, archers, books, numbers”, they put this in the world of life, and they are also effective. But in reality, it is still slightly separated from the real life world; but if this is translated into a remark, “Tender is the degree of degree, joy is the unity of harmony, shooting is the determination of the object, harmony is the grasp of the subject, books are the teachings of classics, and many are the logical thoughts”[i]. It may not be able to fully express the overall meaning of the meaning of the whole, but it has a new effect because it is connected with the real life world.
If you take another example, it will be clearer. For example, the “Three virtues” are “wisdom, benevolence and courage”, and everyone can say this “wisdom, benevolence and courage”, but there is still a gap; if it is turned into a remark, “wisdom” is the clear brain, “benevolence” is the soft heart and heart, and “brave” is the determined will [ii]. This is obviously closer to the current life world. It sounds natural and sensitive, and there is a vivid and realistic perception in our hearts. Of course, this is a reflection of a certain dimension and lacks the complete meaning of the meaning. However, just like this dimensionality, it has activated a new ability to integrate with the 彩彩. Regarding the development of Chinese philosophy, such conversation and integration are extremely important, because only when such conversation and integration reach a comparable level can we start the creation of new philosophical concepts.
In modern words, whether in modern career or academic words, try to express the meaning of “classical words” that was originally covered by is a process of understanding, slandering, and reconstructing. This process has the effect of creation, which is beyond doubt. We say that “filial piety” is the tracing and worship of the origin of life, and that “leniency” is the interaction between each other and the relationship between each other. To say that “mind is reason” emphasizes that “the inner moral subjectivity is the law that moral reality is followed”, and to say that “nature is reason” emphasizes that “the nature of morality is the law that has moral reality” [iii]. This is difficult to understand, describe, integrate, express and reconstruct. This process is very important. Although it is full of pluralism, discordance, and even causes more trouble and disputes, how to cover differences and allow the living perceptions in the life world to be connected with these words is something that the philosophical world cannot prevent. The study of Western philosophy is like this, and the study of Chinese philosophy is also like this.
If it is said that the Taoist thought of “Tao follows nature”, it must return to the original “region” fieldThere are four years, and man (king) is one of them, “Man follows the earth, the earth follows the sky, the sky follows the Tao, and the Tao follows nature” (Laozi, Chapter 25), this means: the human learning the vastness of the earth, the specific growth, and then learning the superbness of the “Heaven”, towards broad fantasy, and then learning the completeness of the “Tao”, and then learning the completeness of the “Tao”, and returning to Toward the origin of the whole, we must finally learn “natural” and adjust the tranquility of the self-developed harmony. This is a “specific growth” and “broad fantasy”, and then “the origin of the whole”, and finally reach the realm of “self-developed harmony”. I think this kind of explanation is needed, only Only through such comments can Chinese classical philosophy connect with the modern career world, talking, talking, integrating, transforming and creating. If she is just a moment of being stunned. The study of literature is lacking. The study of academic history is different from the study of philosophy history, the study of philosophy history Discussions are also different from discussions about philosophy, which requires appropriateness. I think that if current discussions about philosophy are exposed to Taoism, they cannot speak in the past with “Tao follows nature”, but require deep comments and clear expressions.
2. About The related issues of “word dictation” and “civilized subjectivity”
Because the frequent situation of East West Road, since the end of the 19th century, the interaction and communication of words have increased and not decreased. How can we still maintain the globalization The subjectivity of one’s own civilization still holds the right to speak in his own words, which is the main thing. In fact, he has the currency in international economy, how can he have his own currency, and is strong and powerless, and has a suitable road with other currency areas, which is the subjectivity of this and economic. International and internationally, there must be “country” Only when there is a “internationality”. If there is no country, how can it be international? The coming and development of philosophy are the same as the internationalization of philosophy.
In recent years, there was a hot discussion in Chinese philosophy, discussing the “rightness and compliance with laws and regulations of Chinese philosophy” discussion. Question, of course, this question can be discussed, but if this question is obsessed with “Can Chinese philosophy have its justity and compliance with the law”, then it will be addicted, but if it is discussed “the correctness and compliance with the law of Chinese philosophy is the work of philosophy”, it is OK. This seems to be asking, “Are Chinese people humans? Can he be legal and justified as a man? This question is inappropriate; but if you ask, “Chinese people are humans, and they are legal and justified as a man.” This question can ask many thing
發佈留言